Pet packaging is FMCG with feeling. Owners buy on trust and love, so the pack has to balance warmth and personality with the hard work of ingredients, claims and shelf clarity.
Pet parents decide emotionally then justify rationally. Warmth, personality and a sense of care do the persuading, then the facts close it.
Nutrition and composition statements, feeding guides, claims and range architecture all have to be right. It is FMCG rigour underneath the charm.
Humanisation and premiumisation are reshaping the category. Fresh, raw, functional and treat segments are expanding, and the shelf is getting more crowded and more considered.
Pet food and care packaging sits in a fast-growing, increasingly premium category. It needs the discipline of grocery FMCG, nutrition panels, claims, range architecture, with branding that earns an emotional connection. The studios below work across pet and adjacent FMCG.
Shortlist two or three, send the same brief, and compare. Not sure how your current pack reads on shelf? The Packaging Performance Review gives you an expert view.
Pet food in Australia is largely self-regulated. The key reference is the voluntary Australian Standard AS 5812 for the manufacture and marketing of pet food, written by the Pet Food Industry Association of Australia (PFIAA) with the Australian Veterinary Association and others. Around 97 to 98 percent of prepared pet food by volume comes from PFIAA members, so in practice it sets the labelling norm your pack will be judged against.
Expect to show product identity and species, a statement of composition (guaranteed or typical protein and fat), ingredient listing, net weight, feeding guidance, batch and manufacturer details. Whatever the standard covers, the Australian Consumer Law (ACCC) still applies: every claim on the pack must be truthful and able to be substantiated. Note that state-level pet food regulation is being considered, so treat this as general information, not regulatory advice, and confirm current requirements before you print.
Trust and warmth, backed by clear nutrition and claims. Owners decide emotionally then justify rationally, so the pack must do both.
Closely related. It shares grocery FMCG discipline (panels, claims, range logic) but leans harder on emotional branding.
From a few thousand dollars for one SKU to tens of thousands for a full range. The cost guide covers the ranges.
It is largely self-regulated. The voluntary Australian Standard AS 5812, maintained by the PFIAA, sets best-practice manufacturing and labelling, and most of the market follows it. Australian Consumer Law still requires every claim to be truthful.
Typically product and species identity, a composition statement (protein and fat), ingredients, net weight, feeding guide, and batch and manufacturer details, alongside honest, substantiated claims. Confirm current requirements before printing.
Roughly four to six weeks for a single SKU and six to twelve weeks for a brand and range, depending on scope, the number of variants and rounds of feedback.
This resource is published and reviewed by Morice & Co, a Melbourne packaging and branding studio with over 20 years designing retail packaging across FMCG, supplements, beauty and pet. Every guide is written and checked against primary sources by a practising packaging designer, not an anonymous content team.
Editorial standards →About Morice & Co →Browse Australian studios, or start with an expert read of your current pack.
Browse the directoryRequest a Review